G8 summit climate protection -50 is 100% not enough

50% less yearly production of green house gases until 2005 is ridiculously. It is the question will be -150% less enough, but -150% is the absolut minimum.

-150% GHG until 2050

-50% means each year more GHG in the atmosphere. Only the speed of the increase is halfed. That's like to drive full throttle towards a wall, suddenly the decision to accelerate only half throttle towards the wall. -100 percent is like full throttle and to let the car roll. The car will still roll with high speed towards the wall.

Only values beyond -100% means to brake

It would be reasonable to brake, this means to reduce active the green house gases brought by humanity into the atmosphere. The ruling stuck in the mud fossiles even are not able to think about this. Stuck in the mud fossiles are complete indoctrinated that energy equals GHG. An active lowering of GHG requires large amounts of energy. Possible are:

• Millions km² artificial irrigated, for example by sea water desalination to take by biomass CO2 out
• Filter CO2 out of the air and split it in carbon and oxygen.

Before the booster rockets ignite

Imagine You drive full throttle towards a wall. To make the situation even worse, there are booster rockets mounted on the car. The fuse just starts burning. When they ignite, You will crash even faster into the wall. The unfreezing permafrost grounds are this burning fuse at the booster rockets. The solution is built new photovoltaic factories as fast as possible. Resarch New lithium batteries with more money than spent in the Manhattan projckt.