G8 summit climate protection -50 is 100% not enough

50% less yearly production of green house gases until 2005 is ridiculously. It is the question will be -150% less enough, but -150% is the absolut minimum.

-150% GHG until 2050

-50% means each year more GHG in the atmosphere. Only the speed of the increase is halfed. That's like to drive full throttle towards a wall, suddenly the decision to accelerate only half throttle towards the wall. -100 percent is like full throttle and to let the car roll. The car will still roll with high speed towards the wall.

Only values beyond -100% means to brake

It would be reasonable to brake, this means to reduce active the green house gases brought by humanity into the atmosphere. The ruling stuck in the mud fossiles even are not able to think about this. Stuck in the mud fossiles are complete indoctrinated that energy equals GHG. An active lowering of GHG requires large amounts of energy. Possible are:

Millions km² artificial irrigated, for example by sea water desalination to take by biomass CO2 out
Filter CO2 out of the air and split it in carbon and oxygen.

Before the booster rockets ignite

Imagine You drive full throttle towards a wall. To make the situation even worse, there are booster rockets mounted on the car. The fuse just starts burning. When they ignite, You will crash even faster into the wall.

The unfreezing permafrost grounds are this burning fuse at the booster rockets. The solution is built new photovoltaic factories as fast as possible. Resarch New lithium batteries with more money than spent in the Manhattan projckt.

Politics - political targets of PEGE
	Nonpolitical, pragmatic, on the other side of ideologies counts in our politic only one target: A long time lasting civilization able to develop further on a stable base.

Philosophy
	Long-term planning and stability have to be the guiding rules of politics. A philosophy based on the mathematic branch of games theory.

Living standard
	What is living standard? How is living standard correctly measured? Is it possible, that our living standard declines drastic, while uncorrect numbers want to make us belive it's like paradise?

Taxes tax politics
	The consequences of the tax politic for humans and environment. The politicians claim to fight for humans and the environment, but the tax politics shows the exact opposit.

Energy politic
	Decades of wrong energy politic. Instead of more living standard with less energy usage, partial the contrary was reached. A result of the wrong tax politic.

Danger low oil price
	January 24th 2009: Claudia Kemfert, leader of the department for energy at the DIW German institut for economic resarch reveals the dangers of a low oil price.

Next oil crisis
	Forecast on the next oil crisis where politics and economy in unique incomprehensible decisions go full throttle straight against the wall.

USA: weak government destroies car industry
	The USA could be today leading in the production of modern cars. The laws had been, but a weak government caused the disaster.

D-Day in a historical comparison
	D-Day - Invasion in the Normandy June 6th 1944, the begining of the end of the sutck in the mud rassists vs rest of the world. The suck in the mud fossils will have sone their D-day.

IEA prognosis wrong, pressure from the USA
	This message from November 10th is the big hammer. Look at the news with all the unimportant garbage, showing You, that You are good informed.

US President Obama: car limits: to little to late
	I drove 1993 to 1996 a Renault Espace Minivan from 1989. This minivan built 20 years ago fulfilled the consumption limits in the US from 2016.

Gorbatschow calls the West for a Perestroika
	Gorbatschow took the government after the complete unable for reforms Brezhnev. He knows best, when only a total reform can help.