Economic science is unscientifically

Central part of the economic science is the belive in eternal growth. This belive is incompatibly with science.

1.2 billion cell phones per year is full supply for mankind

Just right now, cell phone producers wail, that it's not possible to increase production beyond 1.2 billion cell phones. But 1.2 billion cell phones mean a full supply for the whole mankind. When from 6.7 billion humans, 6 billione need a cell phone, existing production capacity is enough to exchange the cell phone each 5 years against a new one.

I have since 2003 3 Siemens S55 cell phones in the family. One is replaced autumn last year because of keyboard problems against a new. The other 2 are still used. 5 years usage time is realistic, So we have a for the whole mankind sufficient cell phone production.

Here is nothing to jiggle. Even the most mad marketing man will not be able to persuade humans 5 cell phones per person. When the production costs sink, the turn around of all producesrs will sink.

Eternal economic growth equals a pyramide game

So it's clear, eternal economic growth thinks it's always possible to find more consumers. This is exactly the principle of each Ponzi scheme. Every economic scientist demandig permanent economic growth should be treated like Ponzi.

Why do we need the golden West V2.0
	Already 1979, it was obvious for some people in the GDR (German people republic), that the system will crash between 1990 and 2000. The system was as unable for reforms, that it was only able to succumb.

Chance for the time after the breakdown
	A big number of problems in the world can be traced back to a fundamental wrong tax system. When this system succumbs is it a big chance.

Market saturation
	Less humans are needed for the production. The world production for cell phones is 1.2 billion is enough for 6 billion humans needing every 5 years a new cell phone.

Professionally and private
	The division in professional and private expenses created excrescences. In a causal chain low birth rate, immigration and right radicals.

The end of the CO2 tax
	The CO2 tax is not once installed, but before the installation, there have to be thoughts about the drastic down turn of the CO2 tax.

After the CO2 tax
	When with increasing CO2 tax more and more of social expenses are covered, it's necessary to think about decreasing income of the CO2 tax.

Decreasing CO2 tax
	Social security insurance financed by the CO2 tax, but what to do, after the CO2 tax can only tax the gasolin for an oldtimer event?

Tax declaration
	The old tax system is complicate and it's possible to manipulate. In the new system, most humans have only to declare the ground usage.